Adaptive geometry control

Real-Time Adaptive Control with Continual Learning for Robotic Construction 3D Printing

A completed RL–IELM–MPC study combining simulation-trained guidance, continual online modeling, and constrained predictive control for robotic mortar printing.

Reinforcement learningContinual learningPredictive controlLaser sensing
Adaptive robotic mortar printing demonstration
Adaptive Robotic Construction Control Demonstration

Keeping geometry consistent as material changes

Fresh mortar changes its response during printing. A fixed set of process parameters can therefore produce inconsistent layer width and height. This study closes the loop between measured geometry and robot motion to adjust nozzle travel speed and vertical nozzle offset during printing.

How the framework works

  1. Simulation-trained reinforcement learning (RL) supplies baseline actions using knowledge learned from discrete element method simulations.
  2. An incremental extreme learning machine (IELM) updates a local forward model from physical printing measurements.
  3. Model predictive control (MPC) refines the baseline action using predicted geometry, subject to process bounds and smoothness constraints.

A laser profile scanner measures deposited width and height. Segment-wise updates connect sensing, model adaptation, and physical actuation on a UR10e robot with a custom auger extruder. The extrusion-rate command remains fixed in this study; speed and nozzle offset provide the adaptive actions.

Experimental demonstrations

Original experimental recordings show baseline and adaptive robotic mortar-printing trials. The framework uses laser-scanner measurements to guide geometric control while adjusting robot motion. See the demonstrations below; the formal quantitative evaluation is reported in the journal article.

Publication and recognition

Status: Accepted for Publication (2026).

Real-Time Adaptive Control with Continual Learning for Robotic Construction 3D Printing

Muhammad Arslan, Abdul Wahid Mangi, Vedhus Hoskere (2026).

Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).

DOI: 10.1061/JCCEE5.CPENG-8585

The related EMI talk received Second Place in the Experimental Analysis and Instrumentation Paper Competition at EMI 2026, Boulder, Colorado. Official ASCE winners announcement.

RESEARCH IN VIEW

Adaptive robotic construction control

Experimental demonstrations

Fixed-parameter baseline

Robotic deposition of grey and reddish mortar layers using fixed process parameters.

Hybrid RL–IELM–MPC control

Robotic mortar deposition using hybrid RL–IELM–MPC control. Geometric accuracy is evaluated using measured width and height errors.